From: | Felipe Schnack <felipes(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc-list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cursornames |
Date: | 2003-08-05 12:59:45 |
Message-ID: | 20030805095945.330d6e7f.felipes@ritterdosreis.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I can't understand what you mean... You shouldn't fetch all the rows if you specify a fetchsize and aren't using server-side preparedstatements...
On 04 Aug 2003 17:38:21 -0400
Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> This fixes the behaviour that Felipe Schnack noticed.
>
> The logic goes, if the statement name is null (which happens when you do
> not use cursors or server prepared statements), then we have already
> fetched all the rows, and there are no more.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kim
>
--
/~\ The ASCII Felipe Schnack (felipes(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br)
\ / Ribbon Campaign Analista de Sistemas
X Against HTML Cel.: 51-91287530
/ \ Email! Linux Counter #281893
Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
http://www.ritterdosreis.br
ritter(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br
Fone: 51-32303341
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-08-05 14:21:07 | Re: setFetchSize() bug? |
Previous Message | LUTZ GEOFFREY | 2003-08-05 12:56:09 |