Domains (Was [PERFORM] Views With Unions)

From: Francisco J Reyes <fran(at)natserv(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Domains (Was [PERFORM] Views With Unions)
Date: 2003-08-01 17:26:47
Message-ID: 20030801131642.Q93127@zoraida.natserv.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Domains were a work-in-progress in 7.3, and to some extent still are.
> Please try to test out 7.4beta and let us know about deficiencies you
> find.

Are domains user defined types? That they seem to be based on what I see
on the docs.

Any drawbacks to using them?

Right now I have a new database I am making and wanted some consistency
accros some tables. Currently I used inheritance to enforce the consitency
since a good number of fields needed to be common among the tables AND the
inheritted tables are basically a supperset of the data, so some times I
would want to access the inheritted tables and other times the parent/main
table.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jenny Zhang 2003-08-01 18:04:10 OSDL Database Test Suite 3 is available on PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-01 16:51:33 Re: Views With Unions

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-08-01 17:32:13 Re: How number of columns affects performance
Previous Message Francisco J Reyes 2003-08-01 17:14:53 Re: How number of columns affects performance