From: | Brage Førland <brage(at)zoo(dot)uib(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions for the next version |
Date: | 2003-08-01 10:13:38 |
Message-ID: | 20030801101338.GA31040@sisyfos.zoo.uib.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:01:44AM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Brage Førland wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:44:03PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >A data view in the right pane could be in addtion to the larger window you
> >get if you choose 'view data' from the context menu. It wouldn't be that
> >small if the right pane wasn't divided in two sections. It also should not
> >have any impact on performance unless the user has the view data-pane in
> >focus.
> >
> >
> That would make the DataView longer, but not wider. If you have only
> tables with <5 columns, that might be ok.... And would increase
> complexity (and usability) concerning menu handling.
I still think there should be a one-click-way to browse the content of the
tables. While pgadmin is a very good tool for database administration, I
believe making the content of the database more accessible would make it a
better tool for database development.
> Why should you run the reverse-engineered SQL? It reflects (partially)
> what's already present in the database! It's suggested as a starting
> point or template to make some more complicated changes. And they could
> be quite dangerous too!
This is what you get currently if you select the QueryTool.
--
Brage Førland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-01 10:28:28 | Re: Suggestions for the next version |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-01 01:13:02 | Re: dlgIndex comment is missing. |