Re: autocommit in 7.4

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autocommit in 7.4
Date: 2003-07-31 04:50:48
Message-ID: 200307310450.h6V4omG12741@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


The issue I have is that every interface that relies on libpq is going
to have to code it itself. Is that OK?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is there a reason autocommit is implemented in psql and not in libpq via
> > a C function call?
>
> One reason is that PQexec accepts multiple-query strings (possibly with
> embedded BEGIN/END), so it's not immediately obvious what the semantics
> ought to be. We could probably work out some reasonable definition if
> we wanted to put effort into it, but seeing that libpq clients aren't
> historically expecting any autocommit support, I didn't find it a high
> priority task for 7.4.
>
> At this point it's definitely too late for 7.4, anyway. Put it on the
> TODO list if you feel strongly about it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-31 04:53:57 Re: followup on previous
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-31 04:49:55 Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)