Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32
Date: 2003-07-31 01:55:28
Message-ID: 200307310155.h6V1tS611122@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


Sounds good.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> "As a result of the API differences between the Windows and Unix operating
> systems, the changes required to *cleanly* patch the PostgreSQL source
> code to compile under Windows proved to be a more daunting task then
> originally expected. As a result, we were unable to bring full Win32
> support into v7.4, but will continue to work towards this goal, aiming
> for integration in v7.5 .. "
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > I ran out of time, just like the PITR guy. Win32 takes tons of time,
> > and working on the PostgreSQL project itself just doesn't allow enough
> > time.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > People,
> > >
> > > > Q. Hey, I read in a bunch of places that 7.4 was going to have native
> > > > windows support, what gives?
> > >
> > > My answer:
> > >
> > > A. PostgreSQL has a well-deserved reputation for "bulletproof" reliability and
> > > stability, which requires each new patch and plug-in to pass stringent
> > > community testing. The Win32 platform has proved to be more of a challenge
> > > than we anticipated in this regard, and we would rather release our Windows
> > > port late than release a version which might fail in production environments.
> > >
> > > But, Bruce, since you're head of the port, wanna comment on this? We're
> > > trying to prepare a "canned" answer for the inevitable questions.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Berkus
> > > Aglio Database Solutions
> > > San Francisco
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> > pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-07-31 09:01:57 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-07-31 01:52:20 Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no