| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32 |
| Date: | 2003-07-31 01:39:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200307310139.h6V1dOE09679@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I ran out of time, just like the PITR guy. Win32 takes tons of time,
and working on the PostgreSQL project itself just doesn't allow enough
time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Berkus wrote:
> People,
>
> > Q. Hey, I read in a bunch of places that 7.4 was going to have native
> > windows support, what gives?
>
> My answer:
>
> A. PostgreSQL has a well-deserved reputation for "bulletproof" reliability and
> stability, which requires each new patch and plug-in to pass stringent
> community testing. The Win32 platform has proved to be more of a challenge
> than we anticipated in this regard, and we would rather release our Windows
> port late than release a version which might fail in production environments.
>
> But, Bruce, since you're head of the port, wanna comment on this? We're
> trying to prepare a "canned" answer for the inevitable questions.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-31 01:43:22 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-31 01:29:37 | Re: [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions? |