| From: | Ragnar Kjrstad <postgres(at)ragnark(dot)vestdata(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | Renney Thomas <renney(at)cris(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication/Failover/HA solution |
| Date: | 2003-07-29 15:16:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20030729151611.GB21461@vestdata.no |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:11:15PM -0400, Renney Thomas wrote:
> I am having a hard time selecting a Replication/Failover/HA solution for
> PGSQL. What is troubling is the number of solutions available in various
> states of development. Does the fact that dbmirror and rserv appear in
> the contrib directory, mean that they should be looked upon with more
> legitimacy? Any suggestions?
One possibility is to run postgresql (regular postgresql - no patches
required) controlled by heartbeat (http://www.linux-ha.org/) on two
nodes. Heartbeat will then make sure that only one of the nodes are
active at any time.
You will have to put the databases on shared storage; either something
like a shared SCSI RAID, or a software replication device like drdb or
md+nbd.
Make sure you have proper fencing in place, so you don't end up in a
situation where both nodes are active and modifying your database.
You should probably subscribe to the linux-ha mailinglist if you want to
take this approach.
--
Ragnar Kjorstad
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John P. Looney | 2003-07-29 16:22:56 | Re: Postgres db corrupted ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-29 14:38:50 | Re: Postgres db corrupted ? |