From: | Francisco J Reyes <fran(at)natserv(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | psql-mail(at)freeuk(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware selection |
Date: | 2003-07-29 15:00:15 |
Message-ID: | 20030729105307.L81136@zoraida.natserv.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 psql-mail(at)freeuk(dot)com wrote:
> The data will be stored on an external raid,
> SCSI based 2.5TB with IDE disks. Configured as 1 large volume, RAID5. (
> We already have this hardware)
How come you did not go with SCSI disks?
Specially 15K ones.
Performance will be much better with RAID 1+0/0+1 than with RAID 5.
> Dell Poweredge 6650
> 16GB RAM
> Quad intel hyperthreaded arch
As others mentioned you may be better off going with a 64bit architecture.
I have no experience with that, but you consider a SUN machine or a HP
Alpha.
> PERC3Q controller
> 36GB System HDD
> approx 20K UKP
My advice would be get just a 2 CPU machine, get a better disk subsystem
and get only 8GB of RAM (or get 64bit and 16GB RAM).
> Any comments on better alternatives or modification to this system
> would be very helpful!
You REALLY need to think out your DB structures and your index schemes.
That could mean all the difference. A good DB organization will help you
probably more than just simply throwing hardware at the problem.
> Question 3 - what would be the best way to distribute tables/swap/
> system disk space?
Throw it all at your RAID 1+0 device.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-07-29 15:30:00 | Re: concurrent writes |
Previous Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-07-29 14:57:41 | Re: CREATE TABLE with REFERENCE |