Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date: 2003-07-27 20:24:19
Message-ID: 200307272024.h6RKOJ719890@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a
> > new parameter?
>
> I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called
> function take a normal C parameter list.

So I need to wrappers for each function, one that pulls the pretty print
option, and another that doesn't, and they both call a normal C function?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-07-27 23:44:41 Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-27 20:15:10 Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option