| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | ivan <iv(at)psycho(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: perm bug ? |
| Date: | 2003-07-24 16:55:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030724165557.GA7206@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 00:32:32 +0200,
ivan <iv(at)psycho(dot)pl> wrote:
>
> When ie function is whitout any grant == public have grant to execute it.
> public or user who have grant to usage on this func. namepsace.
>
> I think when i create function , the default grant should be only for
> owner. specialy when function have security definer .
>
> or , i dont know about sth like umask ???
Note that you can create and remove public access to a function in a
transaction so that there isn't a window where unauthorized people
can use the function.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Haberlach | 2003-07-24 17:17:06 | Really odd corruption problem: cannot open pg_aggregate: No such file or directory |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-07-24 16:46:42 | Re: libpq_r |