Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs
Date: 2003-07-23 20:11:36
Message-ID: 200307231311.36341.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Robert,

> 2) would it be faster in pltcl? seems like it would if i didn't have to
> do the catalog lookups, but is pltcl inherently faster anyways?

Probably, yes. Execution of dynamic query strings in PL/pgSQL tends to be
pretty slow.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-07-23 20:13:48 TODO item for plpgsql Was Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-07-23 20:01:53 Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs