From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | SZUCS Gábor <surrano(at)mailbox(dot)hu> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question |
Date: | 2003-07-21 19:07:32 |
Message-ID: | 200307211907.h6LJ7YV03382@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
SZUCS Gbor wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> I missed your orig. post, but AFAIK multiprocessing kernels will handle HT
> CPUs as 2 CPUs each. Thus, our dual Xeon 2.4 is recognized as 4 Xeon 2.4
> CPUs.
>
> This way, I don't think HT would improve any single query (afaik no postgres
> process uses more than one cpu), but overall multi-query performance has to
> improve.
When you use hyperthreading, each virtual cpu runs at 70% of a full CPU,
so hyperthreading could be slower than non-hyperthreading. On a fully
loaded dual cpu system, you are looking at 2.8 cpu's (0.70 * 4), while
if it isn't loaded, you are looking at slowing down if you are only
using 1 or 2 cpu's.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-21 19:46:48 | Re: Help disk-pages |
Previous Message | Greg Spiegelberg | 2003-07-21 18:51:36 | Mass file imports |