| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like |
| Date: | 2003-07-20 22:56:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200307202256.h6KMurG27881@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> VERBOSE doesn't seem like the right name for the \set parameter. I
> consider VERBOSE to be a possible value for error verbosity. Saying
> '\set VERBOSE terse' seems like an contradiction.
>
> Should we call it VERBOSITY, or something else? Seems 'error' or 'err'
> or 'message' should be in there somewhere too.
>
> Here is a good example of the problem:
>
> > regression=# \set VERBOSE verbose
> > regression=# \set VERBOSE default
> > regression=# \set VERBOSE terse
>
> That is just confusing. It is the parameter name and a possible value.
>
> How about MESSOUTPUT or ERROUTPUT? Both look ugly, though.
OK, if people like VERBOSITY, I wonder if the values should be more like
a tunable parameter, rather than a behavior, meaning VERBOSITY would
have values like off/default/full, or minimum/default/maximum.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-20 23:23:08 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-07-20 22:21:55 | Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like |