From: | Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hardware performance |
Date: | 2003-07-18 03:23:08 |
Message-ID: | 20030717212308.18f30b8d.Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:20:42 +0100
Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> said something like:
>
> Actually I am going through the same questions myself at the
> moment.... I would like to have a 2 disk RAID1 and a 4 disk RAID5, so
> need at least 6 disks....
>
> Anybody have any suggestions or experience with other hardware
> manufacturers for this size of setup? (2U rack, up to 6 disks, 2
> processors, ~2GB RAM, if possible)
>
We recently bought a couple of Compaq Proliant DL380 units. They are
2u, and support 6 disks, 2 CPU's, 12Gb max.
We purchased 2 units of 1CPU, 4x72Gb RAID 0+1, 1Gb mem, redundant fans
and power supplies for around $11,000 total. Unfortunately they are
running Win2K with SQLAnywhere (ClearQuest/Web server) ;-) So far (5
months), they're real board...
Cheers,
Rob
--
21:16:04 up 1:19, 1 user, load average: 2.04, 1.99, 1.38
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabian Kreitner | 2003-07-18 04:47:05 | Re: index / sequential scan problem |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-17 19:10:25 | Table clustering -- useful, or not? |