| From: | Brage Førland <brage(at)zoo(dot)uib(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Properties dialogue/pane |
| Date: | 2003-07-17 18:20:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20030717182003.GA30563@sisyfos.zoo.uib.no |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:05:16PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Brage Førland wrote:
>
> >The columns belonging to a foreign key are named 'Child columns' in the
> >properties pane. Any reason they are not just called 'Columns'?
> >
> and the property dialog calls it "local column"....
> When working with design tools, I always wondered which column is on
> which side of the reference. I want the namings to clearly indicate
> this, so how should we name that beast?
Quoting the PostgreSQL manual:
[...]
We say that in this situation the orders table is the referencing table
and the products table is the referenced table. Similarly, there are
referencing and referenced columns.
However, I should think it would suffice to call the 'local columns' just
columns and the referenced columns, well, 'referenced columns' in most
situations.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2003-07-17 19:12:48 | Re: [kpli] Tanya PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-07-17 17:47:59 | Re: Properties dialogue/pane |