Re: Pgsql - Red Hat Linux - VS MySQL VS MSSQL

From: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Balazs Wellisch <balazs(at)neusolutions(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgsql - Red Hat Linux - VS MySQL VS MSSQL
Date: 2003-07-14 14:06:39
Message-ID: 20030714150639.A20427@bacon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On 13/07/2003 20:51 Balazs Wellisch wrote:

> [snip]
> > > So, does anyone here have any experience using RH AS and DB 2.1?
> >
> > Are RH still selling DB 2.1? I can't find it listed on their web site.
> > --
>
> Yes, it's available for free download. The documentation is here:
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/database/. I'd welcome your oppinions
> on
> this product.
>
> Thank you for your comments.

It looks like they just wrote a number of GUI versions of the command line
utilities. From what I can tell, its still a standard postgresql database
behind the scenes.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Howie 2003-07-14 14:31:26 Tunning FreeeBSD and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Steve Wampler 2003-07-14 13:38:18 Re: [SQL] Replacing a simple nested query?