From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Vincent Hikida <vhikida(at)inreach(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fw: select null + 0 question |
Date: | 2003-07-14 06:45:23 |
Message-ID: | 20030714064523.GB24361@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 11:14:15PM -0700, Vincent Hikida wrote:
> Oops forgot to cc the list.
> > I just happened to notice another difference recently between Oracle and
> > Postgresql for the clause
> >
> > WHERE 1 IN (1,2,NULL)
> >
> > In Oracle, this clause is false because 1 compared to a NULL is false.
> > However, Postgresql will return a true. I actually don't know what the
> ANSI
> > standard is for this case. Perhaps someone else on this list will know.
> > Perhaps the standard body never even thought of this. Yes, I was actually
> > stung by this particular while using it in Oracle.
I can;t comment on what the correct answer is, but I beleive the reason it
works in Postgres is because the expression is expanded to:
WHERE (1=1) OR (1=0) OR (1=NULL)
which becomes:
WHERE TRUE OR FALSE OR NULL
which is TRUE. (standard tri-value logic)
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or
> religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence.
> Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
> - Samuel P. Huntington
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-07-14 07:39:51 | Re: Fw: select null + 0 question |
Previous Message | Vincent Hikida | 2003-07-14 06:43:09 | Re: FYI: geometric means in one step without custom functions |