Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?
Date: 2003-07-14 06:05:01
Message-ID: 20030714060501.GC18432@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:54:55AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:

> SQL is only one possible relational query language. It didn't
> become de facto standard until the mid- to late-80s.
>
> It is an outgrowth of SEQEL (Structured English QuEry Language),
> which was IBM's 1st try at a descriptive query language. DEC
> had RDML (Relational Data Manipulation Language) to access it's
> RDBMS. I'm sure that Burroughs, etc, had their own access methods,
> too.

Of course, in the context of a PostgreSQL list you can't forget QUEL and
PostQUEL, Ingres and POSTGRES query languages respectively.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message listrec 2003-07-14 06:11:59 Re: select null + 0 question
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2003-07-14 05:54:55 Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?