From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL Functions and plan time |
Date: | 2003-07-08 08:08:12 |
Message-ID: | 200307080908.12750.dev@archonet.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 08 Jul 2003 6:39 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> > Does the plan for the body get built at creation or execution time? I
> > could have sworn it was execution time, but timings on one function
> > suggest creation?
>
> It's planned once per query. There's been some talk of building a
> cross-query plan cache for SQL functions, like plpgsql has, but
> nothing done yet.
So why am I getting substantially different times for identical queries
(except for parameter substitution)
[41] LOG: query: SELECT zzz2('2003-07-07 17:00:00+01','2003-07-07
17:20:00+01');
[42-1] LOG: query:
[42-2] DELETE FROM stats_telcon WHERE st_hour >= $1 AND st_hour < $2;
...
[43] LOG: duration: 7.524765 sec
[44] LOG: query: DELETE FROM stats_telcon WHERE st_hour>='2003-07-07
17:00:00+01' AND st_hour<'2003-07-07 17:20:00+01';
[45] LOG: duration: 0.032860 sec
[46-1] LOG: query: INSERT INTO stats_telcon
...
[47] LOG: duration: 1.810267 sec
I don't think I'm getting caching issues here - these aren't the first run.
--
Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mixo | 2003-07-08 08:14:49 | Benchmarking |
Previous Message | Mattias Kregert | 2003-07-08 08:06:16 | Re: Datatypes and performance |