From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuum does not reclaim rows |
Date: | 2003-07-08 04:39:32 |
Message-ID: | 20030708043932.GC11964@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:51:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> but I haven't really thought through the details. In any case, that
> would be extra bookkeeping needed during every transaction start,
> so I'd want to see proof of a generally-useful improvement in return.
For what it's worth, we have redesigned around this very problem,
because we had a table, vacuumed every 5 minutes, which was always >
50% dead tuples. Of course, we _were_ able to redesign around it,
but I'm not sure whether we just moved the problem to a new location.
We'll see in the upcoming weeks. (Our testing says no, but I always
figure there's _some_ strange client case I never thought of.)
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-08 05:34:43 | Re: CREATE DATABASE command in Extended Query mode of 3.0 protocol |
Previous Message | Kenji Sugita | 2003-07-08 03:34:19 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: |