Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Date: 2003-07-07 09:22:52
Message-ID: 20030707092252.GB10293@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:12:56PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> The SGML docs aren't in the DBA's face and are way out of the way for
> DBAs rolling out a new system or who are tuning the system. SGML ==
> Developer, conf == DBA.

I could not disagree more. I'd say more like, if the dba won't read
the manual, get yourself a real dba. Sorry, but so-called
professionals who won't learn their tools have no home in my shop.

Recently, someone pointed out to me that there _was_ a deficiency
in the docs -- one I thought was not there. And in that case, I was
more than willing to be chastised. But claiming that inadequate
comments in the config file are the only things dbas will lok at,
well, frankly, I'm offended.

A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Nuzum 2003-07-07 13:11:39 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Previous Message Dennis Björklund 2003-07-07 09:07:15 Re: [PERFORM] Extreme high load averages