Re: OSF build broken

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OSF build broken
Date: 2003-07-07 04:51:56
Message-ID: 20030706214421.U68362-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> writes:
> > I did a fresh CVS get (2003-07-07 12:30 UTC +10:00), attempted to build on
> > "OSF1 V4.0 1229 alpha" (Tru64 running on alpha) but build failed with:
>
> > In file included from ../../../../src/include/libpq/libpq-be.h:22,
> > from ../../../../src/include/libpq/libpq.h:21,
> > from printtup.c:20:
> > ../../../../src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h:60: `int64_t' undeclared here (not in a
> > function)
>
> Is type int64_t defined anywhere in your system headers? If so, where?

Shouldn't we be checking for its existance (it doesn't appear that the
file uses it conditionally)? It's only C99 AFAIR and even there it's
optional. Also, are we guaranteed that stdint.h will have been included
before pqcomm.h?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-07-07 04:53:35 Re: OSF build broken
Previous Message Philip Yarra 2003-07-07 04:34:18 Re: OSF build broken