Re: PostGreSql equivalents to mssql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Maksim Likharev <mlikharev(at)aurigin(dot)com>
Cc: mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com, adivi(at)maximizelearning(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGreSql equivalents to mssql
Date: 2003-07-06 15:46:28
Message-ID: 20030706154628.GA26998@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:58:40PM -0700, Maksim Likharev wrote:
> > b.> return output parameters
>
> >I dont get this question very much, someone else might be
> >able to help u here.
>
> You cannot have [out] parameters in term of MS TSQL word,
> but your function could return a complex type, that will do a trick.
> Still you cannot return a recordset and [out] params, but do you need
> it?

If you need both, you can use a temp table...

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Aprender sin pensar es inutil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-07-06 19:19:46 Re: Synchronising multiple common fields among tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-06 15:44:42 Re: Sequence Roll Over