From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Maksim Likharev <mlikharev(at)aurigin(dot)com> |
Cc: | mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com, adivi(at)maximizelearning(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostGreSql equivalents to mssql |
Date: | 2003-07-06 15:46:28 |
Message-ID: | 20030706154628.GA26998@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:58:40PM -0700, Maksim Likharev wrote:
> > b.> return output parameters
>
> >I dont get this question very much, someone else might be
> >able to help u here.
>
> You cannot have [out] parameters in term of MS TSQL word,
> but your function could return a complex type, that will do a trick.
> Still you cannot return a recordset and [out] params, but do you need
> it?
If you need both, you can use a temp table...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Aprender sin pensar es inutil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-07-06 19:19:46 | Re: Synchronising multiple common fields among tables |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-06 15:44:42 | Re: Sequence Roll Over |