On Friday 04 July 2003 21:40, Jay O'Connor wrote:
> 2.varchar and int
> I was using a varchar as one field that's part of an index. Looking at the
> data, I realized I could just use an int instead. My assumption would be
> that an int would be faster to serach for thena varchar, so I converted
> the field to int. Is this a valid assumption?
Certainly yes.
Shridhar