| From: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |
| Date: | 2003-07-04 21:20:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200307041420.34726.darcy@wavefire.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Friday 04 July 2003 13:31, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 2. If so, can I get away with applying this post-feature-freeze? I can
> > argue that it's a bug fix, but perhaps some will disagree.
>
> I'd say it is a bug fix.
>
> Michael
I'm with you Michael/Tom on this one as well, Lets at least get this framework
inplace, we can always experment with what values we settle on.
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Conrad | 2003-07-04 21:28:32 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-07-04 21:18:05 | Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-07-04 22:38:56 | An additional foreign key test for regression |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-07-04 20:31:35 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |