From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PHP/PgSQL *and* libpq ... |
Date: | 2003-07-01 23:55:52 |
Message-ID: | 20030701205517.K67063@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> >> Seems like we should also allow for a windows specific distribution of libpq
> >> as well.
> >
> > I thought that the win32 stuff was being included as part of the base
> > distribution? IF so, wouldn't such already be included in any
> > libpq.tar.gz we created? Is there a reason why we'd need a
> > libpq-win.tar.gz (assuming that that is what you are suggesting?) ... ?
>
> I think he meant a separate binary, somehow installer-wrapped libpq.dll
> - right?
>
> Honestly I think that doesn't do much for windows. It would only do if
> we would add many other, more or less dependant interfaces, like ODBC,
> Pgtcl, Pgperl?, JDBC, MyDBC ... but then we get into all the license,
> packaging, distribution hassle.
Well, actually, I believe Dave already does up the ODBC driver in binary
form ...
And dont' we have a 'native, non-cygwin' libpq already?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-07-02 00:09:23 | Re: cvs build failure |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-07-01 23:51:34 | Re: PHP/PgSQL *and* libpq ... |