From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick Hatcher <PHatcher(at)macys(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pg_Dumpall error? |
Date: | 2003-07-01 01:11:52 |
Message-ID: | 20030701011152.GL69704@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Forgive the stupid question, since I'm completely unfamiliar with the
logging changes Tom is busy working on, but would it be worthwhile to
have error messages/asserts include a function/filename where the assert
failed? (I'm assuming this is an assert failure). If the assert code
could be easily changed to add that info, it might be helpful to those
not intimately familiar with the code.
Just a thought.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:03:52PM -0700, Patrick Hatcher wrote:
> I've done numerous dumps, but I've never seen this type of error before:
>
> pg_dumpall > datamart.out
> pg_dump: [archiver] could not write to output file (36 != 97)
> pg_dumpall: pg_dump failed on bdc_oz, exiting
>
> Any ideas?
> I'm running Pg 7.3.2
>
> TIA
> Patrick Hatcher
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Welty | 2003-07-01 01:35:58 | oracle->postgresql references |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-30 23:22:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Share state ( allocated memory ) across two C functions... |