From: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-jdbc (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Most Performant JDBC Driver? |
Date: | 2003-06-29 09:22:23 |
Message-ID: | 20030629102223.A29523@bacon |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 28/06/2003 22:25 Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> Which of the JDBC drivers from jdbc.postgresql.org is the best
> performing?
>
> Besides spec support, is there any difference between JDBC2 and JDBC3?
IIRC, JDBC3 requires JDK1.4. Anyway, the requirements are stated on the
download page.
>
> When you build PostgreSQL and use the '--with-java' command, what version
> of
> the driver is built?
Looking at the source and the build.xml, it will compile the version
applicable to your JVM. i.e.:
JVM1.1 -> JDBC1
JVM1.2 or JVM1.3 -> JDBC2
JVM1.4 -> JDBC3
HTH
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-06-29 11:22:04 | Re: [PATCHES] IPv6 patch doesn't work fine |
Previous Message | Kallol Nandi | 2003-06-29 07:33:05 | Re: Most Performant JDBC Driver? |