Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux

BSD/OS supports:

The pthreads library conforms to IEEE Std1003.1c
(``POSIX'').

How is that different from UNIX98?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip Yarra wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote:
> > According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists.
>
> Thanks for the info - useful to know.
>
> > lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks
> > can be eliminated.
>
> Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to
> be easy to avoid.
>
> > Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads
> > support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after
> > all.
>
> Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it.
>
> Regards, Philip.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073