Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-25 00:26:24
Message-ID: 20030624212453.I5387@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Wieck [mailto:JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:30 PM
> > To: Dann Corbit
> > Cc: scott.marlowe; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
> > PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
> [snip]
> > I personally think you don't actually ever did any software testing
> > yourself. You are not really talking from experience, are you? So
> > please, show me what you have now, or get one more plus on my
> > minus-list.
>
> I have already posted enough information to show my qualitications.
>
> Whether I am qualified or not is irrelevant to whether the argument has
> merit or not.
>
> I have raised what I consider to be an important issue.

You have raised a point that you are not prepared to do anything about
though ... nobody disagrees with you about adding more testing, but if you
aren't willing to do the work, why should anyone else be? Someone has to
spearhead it ... you seem to be passionate about seeing it happen, but
don't care enough to do anything about it ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-25 00:28:23 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-25 00:24:43 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze