From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Maksim Likharev <mlikharev(at)aurigin(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TO_CHAR SO SLOW??? |
Date: | 2003-06-24 08:04:13 |
Message-ID: | 20030624080412.GA16307@zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:08:19PM -0700, Maksim Likharev wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some SQL function, just regular function selects data by using 4
> joins nothing fancy,
> but one thing pretty noticeable,
> I have to display 3 different columns with same date formatted
> differently,
> here are 3 different snippets:
>
> 1. SELECT t.x,t.y,TO_CHAR(t.dt, 'DD/MM/YYYY')
> FROM ( SELECT x, y, dt FROM .... ) AS t
> ...
> 2. SELECT t.x,t.y,TO_CHAR(t.dt, 'DD/MM/YYYY'), TO_CHAR(t.dt, 'Mon-YYYY')
> FROM ( SELECT x, y, dt FROM .... ) AS t
> ..
> 3. SELECT t.x,t.y,TO_CHAR(t.dt, 'DD/MM/YYYY'), TO_CHAR(t.dt,
> 'Mon-YYYY'), TO_CHAR(t.dt, 'YYYY')
> FROM ( SELECT x, y, dt FROM .... ) AS t
> ...
>
> # 1: 15000 rows, I getting data for 130 sec
> # 2: 15000 rows, I getting data for 160 sec
> # 3: 15000 rows, I getting data for 220 sec
>
> adding different fields into output change query time only marginally
> but adding or removing to_char,
> just heavily knocks performance.
>
> is it TO_CHAR so slow??
I don't think to_char() is so slow. What happen with performance
if you use t.dt without formatting or if try some other function
an example extract()?
SELECT t.x, t.y, t.dt FROM ( SELECT x, y, dt FROM .... ) AS t;
SELECT t.x, t.y, EXTRACT(year from t.dt)
FROM ( SELECT x, y, dt FROM .... ) AS t;
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Yarra | 2003-06-24 08:25:32 | ECPG still having thread problems on Linux |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2003-06-24 07:47:55 | Re: [HACKERS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW toUTF-8 |