| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: compile failure on cvs tip --with-krb5 |
| Date: | 2003-06-21 10:49:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20030621104926.GA2021@ping.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 07:48:02PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> This change (I'm sure this will wrap poorly -- sorry):
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h.diff?r1=1.85&r2=1.86
>
> modified SockAddr, but no corresponding change was made here
> (fe-auth.c:612):
>
> case AUTH_REQ_KRB5:
> #ifdef KRB5
> if (pg_krb5_sendauth(PQerrormsg, conn->sock, &conn->laddr.in,
> &conn->raddr.in,
> hostname) != STATUS_OK)
>
> It's not obvious to me what the change ought to be though.
Please try the attached patch.
I'll try to change kerberos 4 later if I can find some
documentation about it. Especially the krb_sendauth() function.
Does Kerberos 4 support other protocols than ipv4?
Kurt
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| krb5.diff | text/plain | 1.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | alvis | 2003-06-21 11:35:53 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2003-06-21 07:16:07 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |