| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? |
| Date: | 2003-06-17 18:20:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20030617182034.GC8184@feivel.fam-meskes.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:11:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I do recommend a a local checking like watchdog or mon, so a restart is
> > tried before the takeover. And I'd make sure the primary machine stays
> > down.
>
> This is going to sound bad to users of Open Source OSs and databases,
> but for all work that has to go into clustering machines and making
> databases work with them...
> ...
Which indeed is load balancing again. I thought we were talking about a
simple failover solution. Yes, I know VMS can do that as well. :-)
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-06-17 18:30:41 | Re: order of nested loop |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-06-17 18:11:49 | Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? |