Re: confused with encodings

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: confused with encodings
Date: 2003-06-17 01:24:12
Message-ID: 20030617.102412.74752421.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo,
>
> recently I tried to understand why I can't get sorting works properly
> with cyrillic characters in UTF8 datbase. I figure out the
> reason of my confusion - I thought I could specify different encodings
> for different databases and these encodings will be used in text operations
> (sort, upper,lower), not just for conversion.
> But, actually, the only encoding is important for text operations - the one
> specified with 'initdb' command ! Is't true ?
>
> If so, it's a big issue :)
>
> After I created separate storage for unicode (initdb -E utf8) and
> restarted postmaster I got success with 'order by', but
> upper(), lower() functions still fails.

[I assume you enable the locale support.]

Dont't ask me. These are locale support problems.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-17 02:01:26 pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump
Previous Message Richard Hall 2003-06-17 01:01:25 Re: Our FLOAT(p) precision does not conform to spec