Re: Why can't you define a table alias on an update?

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:42:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> > Would it be reasonable to have a setting that enabled/disabled this?
>
> No, unless you want to have two complete bison parsers in there. AFAIK
> there's no good way to alter the reserved-word status of a keyword on
> the fly. So either we do it, or not.

Is a startup option considered 'on-the-fly' too?

Backwards compatibility is always so much fun...
--
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"