From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which database part 2 |
Date: | 2003-06-15 15:16:23 |
Message-ID: | 200306151716.23417.jm.poure@freesurf.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Dear Kaarel,
> I had two database courses in my University this semester. One course
> _required_ the homework to be done in MS Access. The other _required_
> the homework to be done in PostgreSQL and C. I have some experience in
> database development but these are all related to schoolwork and have
> been rather small scale where MySQL satisfies.
So you are a real professional. When asking this question, my concern was that
many sofware companies now communicate using "buzzwords" like "speed",
"transactions", "replication", etc... in order to impress end-users and
financial investors.
> Reminds me of the
> "Welcome to the real world,
> Morpheus"
> Hope the PostgreSQL world isn't as dramatic though :)
Sorry, I did not intend to make this comparision.
PostgreSQL is being developped so fast, that you feel like you will never be
able to say "I know PostgreSQL completely". In a way, PostgreSQL is a quest
for knowledge...
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-06-15 19:44:26 | Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark] |
Previous Message | Kaarel | 2003-06-15 08:49:56 | Re: Which database part 2 |