| From: | Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Albrecht Berger <berger1517(at)gmx(dot)ch>, pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ? | 
| Date: | 2003-06-13 13:50:10 | 
| Message-ID: | 20030613135010.71562.qmail@web20805.mail.yahoo.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
I believe that if you return NULL from the trigger
function, the delete will not actually be done.  You
could set the value of the delete flag by reference to
OLD.fieldname.
I have not actually done this myself, so caveat
emptor.
--- Albrecht Berger <berger1517(at)gmx(dot)ch> wrote:
> Hello,
> I need a trigger which is updating a delete flag of
> a row instead of
> deleting it physically.
> 
> How do I implement a trigger which doesn't execute a
> delete without raising
> an exception
> in plsql ?
> 
> CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 BEFORE DELETE ON table1
> FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE setDeleteFlag ();
> 
> If I use
> RAISE EXCEPTION "..."
> the delete statement isn't executed, but I think the
> transaction is rolled
> back too, am I right ?
> 
> So what is the best way to implement something
> (Oracle like) like that :
> CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 INSTEAD OF DELETE ON table1
> FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE setDeleteFlag ();
> 
> thx
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-13 13:57:25 | Re: trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ? | 
| Previous Message | Matthew Nuzum | 2003-06-13 13:09:52 | Re: trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ? |