From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which database? |
Date: | 2003-06-10 13:36:52 |
Message-ID: | 200306101536.52301.jm.poure@freesurf.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Dear Kaarel,
> I am fairly new to databases, but my boss has assigned me to choose a
> database system for our company.
If you are learning databases (for example if you do not know the difference
between a table and a view), you may choose solutions like MySQL or MS
Access. Personnaly, I have been using MySQL during 3 months when learning SQL
and then I switched to PostgreSQL because of MySQL inability to parse complex
queries and its poor ODBC interface.
On the converse, if you are looking for a comprehensive business-oriented
solution, you may consider using a bundle of PostgreSQL database server,
pgAdmin3 graphical interface and PhpPgAdmin 3.0 web interface.
Downloading and testing is easy:
- PostgreSQL 7.3.2 : ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.3.3/RPMS
- pgAdmin3 snapshots (Win32 and GNU/Linux GUI) : http://snake.pgadmin.org
- PhpPgAdmin 3.0 RC-1: http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/
Also, PostgreSQL is well documented:
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=1&file=index.html
- http://techdocs.postgresql.org/
Many projects are centralized at GBorg - http://gborg.postgresql.org
Don't look for complicated things: PostgreSQL main advantage is to answer
***all*** your needs at once, even the most advanced ones (views, triggers,
server-side languages, multi-byte support, etc...).
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Louis Leroy | 2003-06-10 13:47:06 | Re: Which database? |
Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2003-06-10 12:46:54 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |