Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-10 21:27:30
Message-ID: 200306101427.30123.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Yes. It's toast ... didn't you see that flamewar a couple months ago?

Nope, missed it. There's enough traffic on this list that I ignore anything
that I'm not working on.

So are we eliminating the autocommit GUC entirely, or just from
postgresql.conf?

(I never used the setting, myself ...)

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:28:43 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:26:23 Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II