| From: | Jonathan Gardner <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new protocol |
| Date: | 2003-06-09 15:42:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200306090842.26352.jgardner@jonathangardner.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 June 2003 10:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> * Better FunctionCall API?
>
> nah, just deprecate in favor of invoking the function via
> PQexecParams().
>
I'll admit -- the current state of PQfn is practically unuseable. However, the
idea is pretty cool. I think it would be nice to have a direct function call
mechanism that bypasses the parser.
Of course, I don't think I understand completely what PQexecParams would do...
:-(
- --
Jonathan Gardner <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net>
(was jgardn(at)alumni(dot)washington(dot)edu)
Live Free, Use Linux!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5KrhWgwF3QvpWNwRAjTlAKCUqaI77lEPxonGo2gR3c0e38lJuACeLzJe
2Sr1bewQmQT4B72bALFf9HQ=
=9SC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-09 15:46:57 | Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new protocol |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-06-09 14:47:26 | Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-09 15:46:57 | Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new protocol |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-06-09 08:40:33 | Re: [INTERFACES] cannot insert zero in to numeric field |