Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

I kind of prefer the way things were grouped together in 7.2 vs. 7.3. If I
needed to check out connection information or look at query tuning flags,
they were all right next to each other and I didn't have to scroll back and
forth through the list. Luckily most of the topical variables share somewhat
common names (max_fsm_relations and max_fsm_pages) or else it would really be
easy to overlook some settings.

Robert Treat

On Saturday 07 June 2003 12:33 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think people thought if you were doing SHOW ALL, you were looking for
> a specific variable, so alphabetical was best.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > 4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?
> >
> > I think this was touched on before, but was there a final determination
> > of the ordering of the "show all" command? I'm hoping that will return
> > in the new order of the postgresql.conf
> >
> > Robert Treat
> > --
> > Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org