From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: compile error on cvs tip |
Date: | 2003-06-01 03:52:54 |
Message-ID: | 200306010352.h513qsS05070@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> >
> > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > changing those field names.
> >
> > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in the
> > PAM or Kerberos4 support --- can anyone try those?
>
> krb4 code should be removed from PostgreSQL ASAP for various
> insecurities in the protocol. It's been removed from FreeBSD, MIT,
> and Heimdal's code base and is officially unsupported as of June this
> year. -sc
Did we decide we _didn't_ want to remove krb4? Removal seems like a
good idea to me, but I am just checking if the consensus was to keep it.
I think someone said it was OK in a closed environment or something.
Maybe we need to document that it is not recommended.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-01 04:09:38 | Re: How about an am_superuser GUC parameter (non-settable)? |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-06-01 03:08:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |