From: | "Nikolaus Dilger" <nikolaus(at)dilger(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | yusuf0478(at)netscape(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan |
Date: | 2003-05-31 15:07:15 |
Message-ID: | 20030531080716.20944.h004.c001.wm@mail.dilger.cc.criticalpath.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
David,
I say go ahead and use it since you get a significant
performance gain. This is a special case where you
know more about your data than the planer does with
general system wide settings. In Oracle you could use
"hints". Since there are no hints in PostgreSQL
disabling and reenabling an option just before and
after a query has the same effect.
Regards,
Nikolaus
On Fri, 30 May 2003 16:33:07 -0400, Yusuf wrote:
>
> In the application, that I'm working on, I have a
query
> that'll be a lot
> 60% faster if I disable sequential scan forcing it to
> you my index.
>
> Is it bad practice to disable sequential scan ( set
> enable_seqscan=false), run my query then enable
> sequential scan,
> whenever I'm running this query? Why?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> - David Wendy
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 16:13:12 | Re: db growing out of proportion |
Previous Message | Robert Creager | 2003-05-31 04:50:02 | Re: db growing out of proportion |