Re: [GENERAL] dbmirror revisions

Are any of these changes ready for CVS for 7.4?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed L. wrote:
> I've been modifying dbmirror and wanted to offer my changes to anyone that
> cared to experiment, FWIW. My effort is ongoing, the docs aren't perfect,
> I make no claims of production readiness, and testing of this latest
> version has been minimal, so I strongly advise you to conduct your own
> thorough testing before considering a production deployment. That said,
> it's a significantly improved solution for our async master-slave needs,
> with a few caveats below, and shouldn't be too hard to setup.
>
> There are enough changes that I would hardly consider this a patch, closer
> to an overhaul, since I've removed files, renamed others, and added new
> files. Among the changes I've made so far:
>
> * Added script for easier setup of many tables/dbs/slaves;
> * Added initial support for multiple master replicating distinct data to a
> single slave;
> * Added batching to minimize load on master and net traffic. You can grab
> a configurable number of updates to replicate before hitting the master
> again.
>
> * Added port specification;
> * Wrapped all replication in transactions;
> * Bulletproofed against downed master or slave;
> * Started modularization of DB access layer, added some error
> handling;
> * Added a number of config vars for sync delays, etc;
> * Eliminated bug in transaction ordering for replay. Updates cannot
> be replicated in the order of the transactions (see archives for discussion
> of why).
>
> * Eliminated need for clear_pending.pl by making dbmirror.pl
> self-clearing;
> * Collasped schema into 1 queue table for performance;
> * Changed sequence ID column types to BIGINT for 64-bit sequence;
> * Added reconnection handling for robustness;
> * Added local tracking of last seq_id to help with recovery
> robustness;
> * Added master/slave compatibility checking;
> * Enabled slave setup during production service so master does not
> have to stop serving.
> * Renamed tables to minimize namespace conflicts;
> * Added lots of logging/debug messages;
>
> * Maybe a few other things I've forgotten...
>
>
> AFAICS, there are still at least a few major drawbacks to this approach:
>
> * DML statements are not replicated (same for eRServer, AFAIK).
>
> * SEQUENCE objects are not handled; nextval() will not be replicated, so
> sequence objects (and serial columns) between master and slave can easily
> get out of sync. I wonder if eRServer has this same issue?
>
> * Mass updates/deletes/inserts of 5000 rows with a single SQL command on
> the master will result in 5000 individual trigger-firings, and 5000
> individual replication inserts on the slave. Rumor has it eRServer's
> snapshot gets around this problem.
>
> The code is here:
>
> http://bluepolka.net/dbmirror/dbmirror-20030403-1605.tar.gz
>
> Ed
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073