Re: priority on a process

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6(at)bcbsm(dot)com>
Cc: "pg-general (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: priority on a process
Date: 2003-05-17 03:53:20
Message-ID: 20030517035320.GC3336@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 02:16:04PM -0400, Johnson, Shaunn wrote:
> <ps info>
> postgres 11467 3.4 0.3 8204 3176 ? D 07:58 12:02 postgres:
> charles testdb [local] UPDATE

As other people have pointed out, your disk is probably quite busy. Run
"vmstat 1" and look where the activity is.

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or
> religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence.
> Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
> - Samuel P. Huntington

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2003-05-17 04:11:19 VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-05-17 03:30:14 Re: Heterogeneous service (like Oracle or Ms SQL Server)