From: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-owner+M38846(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? |
Date: | 2003-05-14 22:02:36 |
Message-ID: | 20030514220236.GA39566@perrin.int.nxad.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> (2) It's in our interest if things like the Queue/ShMem stuff
> >> is part of pgsql as it means one less of a merge hassle in
> >> future.
>
> Sean> I'd be quite interested in the work as it would remove my
> Sean> dependence on jabberd as a distributed event/message bus and
> Sean> I could keep everything inside of PostgreSQL, which is
> Sean> always a good thing. :) -sc
>
> Sounds great ! Would it make more sense for us to correspond privately
> and see if you can use our code and then submit a patch ?
>
> Or is it better to have a discussion on HACKERS itself and lend itself
> to further googling.
Do you have a URL for the patch? If not, send it to me privately. I
can take any non-critical issues off line but I bet others have an
interest in this code as well.
I'm particularly interested in the API atm to see how hard it would be
to integrate. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-14 22:44:56 | Re: Client encoding conversion for binary data (was Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs) |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-05-14 22:02:06 | Re: [GENERAL] Status reporting for COPY |