Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-owner+M38846(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
Date: 2003-05-14 22:02:36
Message-ID: 20030514220236.GA39566@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> (2) It's in our interest if things like the Queue/ShMem stuff
> >> is part of pgsql as it means one less of a merge hassle in
> >> future.
>
> Sean> I'd be quite interested in the work as it would remove my
> Sean> dependence on jabberd as a distributed event/message bus and
> Sean> I could keep everything inside of PostgreSQL, which is
> Sean> always a good thing. :) -sc
>
> Sounds great ! Would it make more sense for us to correspond privately
> and see if you can use our code and then submit a patch ?
>
> Or is it better to have a discussion on HACKERS itself and lend itself
> to further googling.

Do you have a URL for the patch? If not, send it to me privately. I
can take any non-critical issues off line but I bet others have an
interest in this code as well.

I'm particularly interested in the API atm to see how hard it would be
to integrate. -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-05-14 22:44:56 Re: Client encoding conversion for binary data (was Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs)
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2003-05-14 22:02:06 Re: [GENERAL] Status reporting for COPY