From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | csajl <csajl(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? |
Date: | 2003-05-13 10:58:17 |
Message-ID: | 20030513055817.N66185@flake.decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:03:38PM -0700, csajl wrote:
>
> wow.
>
> that did it. so much for my knowing SQL...
> >
> > How about something like:
> >
> > select c.class_id, c.areacode, c.title from
> > classifieds c,
> > (select distinct areacode from cm_areacode where site_id='10') a
> > where c.class_cat_id='1' and c.areacode=a.areacode;
> >
Wow, I'll have to keep that in mind. Shouldn't the optimizer be able to
handle that? Could this get added to the TODO?
--
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-13 14:46:12 | Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? |
Previous Message | csajl | 2003-05-13 04:03:38 | Re: [repost] partial index / funxtional idx or bad sql? |