| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CIDR in pg_hba.conf |
| Date: | 2003-05-07 17:16:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200305071316.21976.darcy@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 09:50, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> So in hba.c, if we found a / in the IP address, we wouldn't go looking for
> a separate netmask field.
Is anyone else uncomfortable with variable number of fields? I know there is
prior art but it still spooks me a little. How about a space after the
address and before the slash? That way the netmask is in the same field as
always (as are the following fields) and it's just an alternative syntax.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-07 17:28:27 | Re: Protocol V3 question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-07 16:29:19 | Re: CIDR in pg_hba.conf |