From: | Erik Ronström <kvarken(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Server error |
Date: | 2003-05-07 10:48:38 |
Message-ID: | 20030507104838.16633.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi again,
thanks for the answers.
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > Sig 11 means you have bad memory or CPU, about 99.9% of the time.
>
> In my part of the universe, about 99% of the time it means you've
> found a software bug ;-) ... especially if you can create an example
> case that is reproducible on another machine. Erik, can you wrap up
> a test case?
99% + 99.9%, that makes 198.9 percent :-)
Unfortunatly, the function depends heavily on the database structure. I
tried to extract the essential parts to reproduce the problem within a
small test DB, but then everything worked just fine! But I will post an
example when I get one...
> And which PG version are you running, anyway?
7.2.1. I've heard it has some bugs, but the guy running the server
refuses to upgrade to _anything_ that isn't cleared by Debian. 7.3
should have been cleared some days ago, but it hasn't, don't know why.
Best regards
Erik
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-05-07 11:45:48 | Re: Small bug in postgres' ./configure script and invalid |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-05-07 09:48:48 | Re: Cancelling a command. |