| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bjorn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is the best practise for "autonumbering"..? |
| Date: | 2003-05-06 11:47:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030506114757.GB2076@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Bjorn T Johansen wrote:
> Using Postgres' own serial type or handling the sequences manually?
Use the SERIAL type. Just create a column with that type and omit it on
INSERT statements -- that way, the default value will be assumed, which
is the next value for the sequence. You can't have trouble this way.
Note that you can also specify a value for the column in an INSERT (or
UPDATE) statement, and in that case the sequence won't be modified,
which can be a problem later when the sequence hits that value. You can
also set the column to a number lower than the current value of the
sequence, of course.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Dios hizo a Adán, pero fue Eva quien lo hizo hombre.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrass Ziska Davidsen | 2003-05-06 12:17:53 | Re: restoring ver 7.2 database |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-05-06 11:41:51 | Re: Timebased user access |